The portion of the fifth amendment upon which those charged with Communist affiliation or espionage must rely is that provision. Which states that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The Senate Sub-Committee on Internal Security which is a subdivision of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary has stated definitely that “fear of disgrace. embarrassment. Or exposure of — one’s past associates is not proper grounds for the invocation of the privilege.”
The Sub-Committee states:
On the part of a witness was that it constituted an affirmation that if he answered the particular question truthfully. he would be providing at least a link in a chain of circumstances that could lead to his conviction for. A crime against which the statute of limitations has not run.” To which the Committee adds: “Moreover. The Sub-Committee could not fail to observe that in virtually every case the witness invoked his privilege. Against self-incrimination only when it became apparent that the evidence available to the Sub-Committee was so concrete and substantial that a denial would expose him to possible prosecution (for perjury). Otherwise. he unhesitatingly denied membership.”
From all this the Sub-Committee concludes: “
For these reasons. the Sub-Committee considered the claim of privilege. particularly on the question of Communist membership. Extremely significant in the determination of those who were Communists.” (Report of Sub-Committee on Internal Security. United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Subversive Influence in the Educational Process. pp. 6-8.)
The Commission of Jurists. appointed by job function email list the Secretary General of the United Nations. Reviewed this matter and came to the same conclusion. Dealing with those who refuse to answer on charges of espionage. the Jurists declare: “The officer has refused to answer the question on the only lawful ground open to him. namely.
In answering he would become a witness
In our opinion such a person is just as unsuitable for continued employment by the United Nations in the United States as one who had actually been convicted. and his employment in the United Nations should not be continued.” The same how to create an online store opinion was also given regarding anyone who claimed privilege and refused to answer concerning his Communist Party membership. (Activities of United States Citizens Employed by the United Nations. Report of Senate Sub-Committee on Internal Security. pp. 8-12)
In other words. both the Senate Sub-Committee on Internal Security and the United Nations Commission of Jurists declare marketing list that if any teacher. professor. or government employee refuses to answer concerning Communist Party affiliations or espionage work. it is because a “yes” answer on his part would be a link which would convict him of a crime connected directly with the answer.