A common argument for leaving X is that disinformation and hate speech are less combated than before. However, moderation remains a complex issue. Musk has relaxed certain moderation practices, but also introduced Community Notes, a system in which users correct each other. This should make the moderation process more democratic and more dependent on the community than on central fact-checkers.of moderation
The question remains: who determines
A what is misinformation? History shows that fact-checking is not always neutral or phone number library flawless. During the corona pandemic, it became clear that platforms such as Facebook censored information at the request of governments, including scientific contributions that later turned out to be correct. Even Mark Zuckerberg admitted that Meta censored during this period under pressure from government agencies. This shows how difficult it is to determine ‘the truth’ in real time , especially in complex societal and scientific issues.
Moreover, it’s not just on X that misinformation and extremism thrive. Misleading stories also spread on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok . Abandoning X in response to misinformation ignores the broader challenge of how social media functions in the first place.
Another factor that compounds this challenge is the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). AI tools can generate increasingly realistic-looking disinformation, making it even harder to separate fact from fiction. The big question is how to regulate the use of these technologies to counter disinformation and safeguard the marketing list truth, without endangering freedom of expression.
Social media as a political instrument
Another underlying problem is that social media are increasingly being used as a political instrument. strategy for schools on linkedIn Governments, interest groups and even secret services are trying to influence what is and is not visible. The fact that X is now under fire is not only due to a deterioration in moderation, but also to a shifting power dynamic.